Rocaeditorial published in the coming days the book of Daniel Domscheit-Berg, "Wikileaks WITHIN" with a subtitle on foot cover that reads: "My time in the world's most dangerous website."
I read the manuscript of Daniel, until recently close partner of Julian Assange, at a stretch and as I step into the fabric of the recent history of the web of transparency and leaks, I realized that these characters are made of sterner stuff rare mortals the information. Beyond the troubles, discrepancies and final rupture between Julian, the founder, and Daniel, spokesman Wikileaks, which goes beyond the pages of the book is that information has no barriers for these hackers to computer systems and state institutions. often feel more short-circuited by the media, who give up their data and the severe need, which government and corporate attacks.
Julian's desire and Daniel to create a "free port of journalism" in Iceland where we can preserve freedom of expression without limits and house, with all the guarantees, the servers that contain the receiving anonymous leaks is a sign of mistrust also have the press in general, considered mediated by political commitments, advertising and business that supports it.
Assange Domscheit-Berg and worked almost in hiding, encrypting their communications and submitting to military discipline worthy of the classic manuals of concealment and security of the most seasoned spies. The information handled forced them to take maximum precautions.
Anything goes against the transparency of information but in the end, and the role financial donations to the glittering successes of "Collateral Murder" in Iraq, Swiss banking and cables to embassies, among others, managed to break the tandem of these characters.
Today, Daniel has created Openleaks after being sacked by Julian Assange fulminant course, using encrypted chat rooms through which they communicated and transcribed Daniel in the book "Inside Wikileaks." Daniel
not blush to confess that contains thousands of documents Wikileaks in their new servers and does not intend to use them. Just the home in its new site because of Assange understands that no longer secure. When it is the returned. This is a way of acting within the logic of Daniel, a former head of the security systems of a German company when it made a staff restructuring took account of the CEO to send in its behalf, a letter to all employees and thus destabilize the company shortly before joining the chat through Julian Assange to Wikileaks. Jealousy of the founder
that Daniel considers one of the most intelligent ever known, at the same despot, tyrant and dictator, among other niceties, were the trigger for it to sink this marriage of transparency.
the end these special beings are loners who ride against everything and everyone. Subject to the assumptions of the mainstream media is something we do not usually get along. The game rules do not go through censorship or the concessions agreed upon. When a source
falls, as the American soldier Manning, foundations seeking income and anonymous donors to pay for his defense, but Wikileaks should not be the paradigm of good square box, as Daniel, and when several hand put both in dollars servers as being out of the broad outlines. Possibly
organized or sponsored such a fit only a single baton against what he claims Domscheit-Berg. He, in fact, boasts of having fitted his Openleaks under the aegis of a team that makes decisions democratically.
do not know, I do not see hackers together in a union, rather uncoordinated able to act under a common goal that neither they usually know a priori. Recommend
into the guts of Wikileaks and learn first hand how "organized" the sources that are giving to journalism life expectancy information that independence is still possible despite the current media ism.
Everyone will draw their own conclusions, but the truth is that there would have to support these sources as imperfect as they are in your organization.
0 comments:
Post a Comment