Something does not fit in the English political situation. The government insists on cutting lately, prohibit and limit, while the opposition People's Party never stops in to say that you have to do is eliminate coercive laws and fail to deliver every day measures that call into question the freedom of the city, in true scope of the liberalism of the modern right.
From the point of view of people think, according to surveys, Zapatero and his leftist government is making the electoral harakiri with such occurrences.
If now, we can not afford to move to 120 kms per hour, nor have the cities and roads so bright, and we can retire at 65, among other improvements, it requires a good deal of explanation, a communication plan that comes with clarity to all citizens.
not want to be alarmist, but I imagine that we are running in frame with the reserves of oil and electricity shortage, plus the social security box is stiffer than the president
Camps in their mass rallies.
Otherwise, be difficult to understand that a government one year short of the election date would be involved so vehemently force unpopular measures. Maybe that's why Zapatero message is "All for Spain first of all by the PSOE, even knowing that it will cost a significant bump in the polls. No anti-electoral measures can be taken if you have an ace in the hole and here the only victory that counts is the fix in a few months of unemployment and credit to businesses, and cutting spending on public investments in state spending, I see very complicated.
So, the media have entered fully analyze, compare and dissect each measure adopted. Hundreds of pages written, television talk shows and reports radiated invade us about the extent of the descent speed of 110 kms. per hour. Journalists who perform tests to demonstrate its utility spent more or less going to 120 or 110. Automotive institutions that prove otherwise and the same as defending the government, writers are saying that if you lower the speed should also lower the tolls of the new highways that will temporarily turn on highways, experts who see the situation Libya's civil war because of these decisions and, while on the road, gasoline soars, interest rates rise, unemployment rises and the light end of the tunnel is so weak as we want to put the government.
There is good communication with citizens, there is no medium-term plan, all are temporary measures or surprising. I say surprising, because I imagine that the situation of low energy consumption should have been a constant feature of our political program and not subject to ad hoc measures.
On the other side lies the opposition who questioned everything, and nothing will convince most mocks relying on improvisation and ineffective government.
In between, the English, which only we abide by, pay fines and suffer the bureaucracy and inefficiency of government. The media, according to their color, are aligned with either end and the information seems more skewed than ever. Of course we are in pre-election period ...
By the way, we better move to 110 as indicated by the new stickers to the highway, even though my car seems to spend more at that speed, though, as I have said, depends on the friction of the wind, the state the floor of the road and traffic ... It's always better meet the new risk as the radar you put on your site. Better late than expensive, it is important to know where it goes. Do we know?
0 comments:
Post a Comment